Friday, July 2, 2010

More Questionable Decisions from Head of Dallas Housing Authority

UPDATE:  Apparently my comments are being e-mailed with a header that says I am calling "to remove DHA leadership." I am not calling for anyone's firing. My post speaks for itself.

I woke up to this headline on DMN's Oak Cliff blog:

"Housing authority delays decision on West Dallas water sports project"

This headline refers to the Dallas Watersports Complex planned for Fish Trap Lake in West Dallas (which is owned by the Dallas Housing Authority). It would have created over 200 jobs and other opportunities for youth from lower-income households in the community. It would also take a forgotten lake in a struggling part of Dallas and helped to transform the area.  Wakeboarding is just catching on here but is huge in other parts of the country and around the world.

To me, this delay is both disappointing and baffling.

This group has spent over $800,000, and from what I understand ordered millions of dollars in equipment. They did all the right things, engaged the community, and got unanimous approval at both the City Plan Commission and City Council level. They had major national events lined up for this site. And now, she wants to wait until winter of 2010 or spring 2011 JUST to make a decision.

I truly think the competency of the head of the DHA has to be questioned at this point. These are the kind of decisions that make people not want to invest in our City, because certain officials don't know when to push well-planned, well-funded projects and get out of the way and yet hold up the ones with issues that need to be worked out.  On the other hand, the complete botching of the community relations surrounding the supportive housing plan in North Oak Cliff was pushed at all costs by the same entity. Ponder that for a moment.

I would also love to find out who this "coalition of West Dallas non-profits" is that is trying to derail the project.  They had zero reservations as this project took months to move through City Plan Commission and City Council. Also, the lake was stagnant for decades.  When the only push back is "the neighborhood doesn't want it," such an argument doesn't hold water because the lake is a city asset (not the asset of a given neighborhood) and we are not talking about an onerous use.

These type of decisions are the ones that keep West Dallas stagnant and stuck in another decade, despite the hard work of City officials, volunteers, and determined community members.

2 comments:

Asille said...

Mr. Davis:
Your insight is astute. Couple your view with your profile, and I admire your tenacity in calling for a change in the antiquated procedures at DHA. Sneaky, arrogant and thoughtless come to mind.
My glimpse of hope is that maybe ALL decisions by DHA’s leader have been put on hold. Because maybe someone at City Hall is reviewing the decision about hiring HER!

raymond said...

This area of Dallas has been neglected for years by eveyone who would have been able to help lift the community to higher levels of progress.

From the very beginning, water tests initiated by the city of Dallas and then processed by the EPA should have been launched. Chad Lacerte even with his drive and vision for the water park needed to stay out of the mix and wait for the results from the EPA. Once these results were made public, then depending on the levels of toxicity, the plans could have moved forward or immediately stopped. It is apparent that the city of Dallas once again, took it upon itself to know what is best for the residents of West Dallas and try to move this project forward, water toxicity levels be damned. To throw our money at this project without knowledge of the water toxicity is a pattern that is emerging from city hall.
Depending on who Al Huddleston uses to test the water, the results have to be circumspect, as well as his intentions. The EPA should be the final voice in this matter.

Here's to the non profits that want to assist the residents of West Dallas that desire to have a higher level of living. But at what cost? The city of Dallas apparently wanted to give the appearance of "someone who cares for them" by pushing this project forward, polluted water or not.